{"id":27177,"date":"2024-01-25T12:05:24","date_gmt":"2024-01-25T17:05:24","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/design.ncsu.edu\/architecture\/?p=27177"},"modified":"2024-01-25T12:05:25","modified_gmt":"2024-01-25T17:05:25","slug":"architecture-the-first-seventy-five-years","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/design.ncsu.edu\/architecture\/2024\/01\/25\/architecture-the-first-seventy-five-years\/","title":{"rendered":"Architecture: The First Seventy-Five Years"},"content":{"rendered":"\n\n\n\n\n
This article was written by Patrick Rand<\/a>, FAIA, DPACSA, Distinguished Professor Emeritus of Architecture, Roger Clark<\/a>, FAIA, ASCA Distinguished Professor Emeritus of Architecture, and David Hill<\/a>, FAIA, head of the School of Architecture, to capture the history of the program as part of the reflections on the College of Design’s 75th anniversary in 2023. <\/p>\n\n\n\n __________________________________________________________________________<\/p>\n\n\n \u201cIn 1948, in this unlikely setting on Tobacco Road, a new School of Design was founded and a new educational idea was given birth. At the core of the school in these early years was an uncompromising belief that comprehensive design would produce a healthy environment, and improved society, and a better life for all. Experimental in nature, the School was open to new ideas and challenges. It identified with the progressive aspirations of the new south, but its perspective was global. Unlike many of its peer institutions emerging from traditional academic positions, the school\u2019s zeal for the new was balanced by an uncommon concern for the broad development of the individual student who was expected to assume a formative role as a creative leader and committed citizen.\u201d<\/p> – Robert Burns Architecture was one of the two original departments in the School of Design when it was founded in 1948.<\/p>\n\n\n\n In 1946 Dean Harold Lampe of the School of Engineering and Dean Leonard Baver of the School of Agriculture proposed to Chancellor John Harrelson to form a new School, bringing together the Department of Architectural Engineering and the Department of Landscape Architecture. The chancellor formed a search committee to identify and interview candidates in the fall of 1947. Henry Kamphoefner, then a professor of architecture at the University of Oklahoma, was offered the position as founding dean of the School of Design.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Henry Kamphoefner accepted the offer with several unusual stipulations. He, to a great extent, cleaned house of the faculty and existing department head. The stipulations were:<\/p>\n\n\n\n The new academic unit was named the School of Design and included architecture and landscape architecture. The Head of Landscape Architecture was Gil Thurlow, who had served on the search committee for the new dean. None of the school faculty had tenure; all had one-year contracts that were revisited annually by the dean.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Dean Kamphoefner displayed a clear vision to establish in only a few years an institution of national and international prominence. He used all means available to him, including the curriculum, faculty and student selections and negotiations for university resources to achieve this goal. Equally quickly, the School of Design became the darling of the university, attracting national attention vastly out of proportion with its size or age.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Key elements making up the foundation for the architecture program were:<\/p>\n\n\n\n In 1970, three years before Henry Kamphoefner retired as dean, the architecture program began to transition to more diverse paths toward architectural education, largely due to national trends. The most notable of these was the transition from the five-year Bachelor of Architecture degree as the only degree path to a four-year non-professional architecture degree with an optional two-year professional Master of Architecture degree following. This 4+2 degree model was manifest here as a 2+2+2 sequence, in which the first two years of basic design were common to all undergraduates in the School of Design.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Several other changes followed, as Dean Claude McKinney (1973-1988) deferred to faculty to conceive and deliver design education, extensively empowering school-wide committees for governance. Among these changes were the following.<\/p>\n\n\n\n In the 1980s, other changes began under Dean McKinney, then continued under Deans Thomas Regan (1989-1994), and Marvin Malecha (1994-2015). They continue now under Dean Mark Hoversten (2015 \u2013 present). The most notable of these were:<\/p>\n\n\n\n Clarity of vision requires capable people who can articulate that vision in such a way that others can give it life. It began with Henry Kamphoefner, but he was greatly assisted by Lewis Mumford, a part-time faculty member who set out the philosophical direction and curriculum of the young school, and who urged the dean to hire Matthew Nowicki as the first department head of architecture. Though Nowicki was only able to serve as head for two years before his tragic death in an airplane crash when returning after two months working on the design of India\u2019s new nation\u2019s capital of Chandigarh. Nowicki\u2019s 1950 design of Dorton Arena would be realized by his collaborator William Henley Dietrick in 1952, two years after Nowicki\u2019s death.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Argentine-born architect Eduardo Catalano became head of architecture in 1951 and remained until 1956 when he took a faculty position at MIT. During his time as head, the stature of the architecture program grew substantially, fueled by the achievements of faculty and students.<\/p>\n\n\n\n A novel administrative model was in place between 1956 and 1967, in which Henry Kamphoefner was both dean of the school and de facto dead of the Department of Architecture.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Robert \u201cBob\u201d Burns, a native of Roxboro, North Carolina, studied under Catalano here and earned his Bachelor of Architecture degree in 1957. He completed graduate studies at MIT, again studying under Catalano, and then working for several years in Catalano\u2019s architectural practice in Boston on several substantial projects. Bob returned to Raleigh in 1965 and became one of our most important and effective faculty members. Bob was head of architecture in multiple stints beginning in 1967, adding up to seventeen years as head. During some of those years he was also associate dean for academics at the school\/college level. Bob was an inspiration to the thousand or more students he taught, and to the faculty colleagues that he mentored. Many of these alums went on to leadership roles in practice and academia. In architecture faculty meetings, while many of us struggled with the complexities of the problems being discussed, Bob would step in to gracefully chart a vivid path to elegant solutions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Clearly, the intellectual \u201cfamily tree\u201d of architecture may have begun with Henry Kamphoefner, but it continues to grow and branch into directions not foreseen by the school\u2019s founders, through the efforts of many who came after them.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Let\u2019s summarize here some of the means used to bring great people to the School of Design and the Department of Architecture.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Clarity of vision, infused with talented people, often yields remarkable achievements. The architecture program earned recognition and acclaim almost immediately.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The talent and ambition of the young School of Design yielded student and faculty works that won national and international recognitions unexpected by such a new, small southern school. Faculty and visiting faculty won praise for their innovative projects carried out in practice, which were published widely. Works by Matthew Nowicki, George Matsumoto, Buckminster Fuller, James Fitzgibbons and many others are examples of this.<\/p>\n\n\n\n School of Design student recognitions took place in the most important international competitions available: the Rome Prize and the Paris Prize annual competitions. To receive eight awards within a twenty-year period was unprecedented. Winning students were the following.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Alums of the architecture program continue to earn respect at prestigious graduate programs, in excellent offices around the world, and have won countless awards and honors themselves.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Like other architecture programs in the country in the 1950\u2019s, white males made up the vast majority of the faculty and student populations. In this context, milestones worthy of note include:<\/p>\n\n\n\n For several decades the architecture program has sought university and external support to enhance minority presence, but support has been insufficient to date. Efforts will certainly continue. Regarding gender, architecture now has approximate parity in male and female student enrollment. International enrollment has recently grown significantly in the graduate Architecture programs.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Leadership in architectural education is another indicator of the influence of this architecture program. The following individuals were elected to serve as president of the Association of Collegiate Schools of Architecture (ACSA) before, during or after being at this school.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The ACSA Distinguished Professor Award sets out \u201cTo recognize individuals that have had a positive, stimulating, and nurturing influence upon students.\u201d Generally, up to 5 individuals per year nationally are selected for this recognition.<\/p>\n\n\n\n (this award program began in 1984)<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n The Topaz Medallion is a singular honor, one person per year nationally is chosen by a panel representing the American Institute of Architects and the Association of Collegiate Schools of Architecture. Two Topaz Laureates were dean at this institution when they were selected.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Leadership in the profession is difficult to quantify. Many noble endeavors go without recognition in standard ways. The American Institute of Architects elevates to the College of Fellows individuals who have distinguished themselves in some way as architects. Each year between five and ten of these honorees are alumni or faculty from our program. Many of the part-time professors of the practice (formerly known as adjunct faculty) who teach studios and courses are AIA Fellows. This talent pool is a rich resource for our students; they serve as role models for emerging professionals. Regarding our permanent faculty, at one time, five of our fourteen full-time faculty in architecture were AIA Fellows. At that time, the only other institution in the country with five or more Fellows was Berkeley, which had 35 full-time faculty.<\/p>\n\n\n\n This inventory of achievements by people associated with the architecture programs certainly continues to grow. Achievements will continue in existing categories, and new categories may emerge reflecting the greater global awareness and cultural diversity of the program.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The School of Architecture continues to draw on the past and build on the foundations established by early administrators, faculty, students, and others. The school is evolving to take on the challenges and opportunities of contemporary architectural education and practice. Some examples of new programs and initiatives include the following.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The School of Architecture offers many opportunities for students and faculty in multidisciplinary research, teaching, and learning: These include the following, and a growing number of others.<\/p>\n\n\n\n A more diverse profession is heralded by a more diverse and international School of Architecture faculty and student body. The BEDA program is ~65% women and over 30% minorities. The graduate program has achieved gender equity and draws students from the US and many other countries. We are taking on major socio-cultural and technological issues to continually address our changing world.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The celebration of the 75th<\/sup> Anniversary of the founding of the School \/ College of Design is a time to proudly reflect, but also to set new goals and boldly venture in new directions. This is the time for us to reassess the vision<\/strong>, engage the people<\/strong> and set off toward new achievements<\/strong>.<\/p>\n","protected":false,"raw":"\n\n\n\n\n This article was written by Patrick Rand<\/a>, FAIA, DPACSA, Distinguished Professor Emeritus of Architecture, Roger Clark<\/a>, FAIA, ASCA Distinguished Professor Emeritus of Architecture, and David Hill<\/a>, FAIA, head of the School of Architecture, to capture the history of the program as part of the reflections on the College of Design's 75th anniversary in 2023. <\/p>\n\n\n\n __________________________________________________________________________<\/p>\n\n\n\n \u201cIn 1948, in this unlikely setting on Tobacco Road, a new School of Design was founded and a new educational idea was given birth. At the core of the school in these early years was an uncompromising belief that comprehensive design would produce a healthy environment, and improved society, and a better life for all. Experimental in nature, the School was open to new ideas and challenges. It identified with the progressive aspirations of the new south, but its perspective was global. Unlike many of its peer institutions emerging from traditional academic positions, the school\u2019s zeal for the new was balanced by an uncommon concern for the broad development of the individual student who was expected to assume a formative role as a creative leader and committed citizen.\u201d<\/p> - Robert Burns Architecture was one of the two original departments in the School of Design when it was founded in 1948.<\/p>\n\n\n\n In 1946 Dean Harold Lampe of the School of Engineering and Dean Leonard Baver of the School of Agriculture proposed to Chancellor John Harrelson to form a new School, bringing together the Department of Architectural Engineering and the Department of Landscape Architecture. The chancellor formed a search committee to identify and interview candidates in the fall of 1947. Henry Kamphoefner, then a professor of architecture at the University of Oklahoma, was offered the position as founding dean of the School of Design.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Henry Kamphoefner accepted the offer with several unusual stipulations. He, to a great extent, cleaned house of the faculty and existing department head. The stipulations were:<\/p>\n\n\n\n The new academic unit was named the School of Design and included architecture and landscape architecture. The Head of Landscape Architecture was Gil Thurlow, who had served on the search committee for the new dean. None of the school faculty had tenure; all had one-year contracts that were revisited annually by the dean.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Dean Kamphoefner displayed a clear vision to establish in only a few years an institution of national and international prominence. He used all means available to him, including the curriculum, faculty and student selections and negotiations for university resources to achieve this goal. Equally quickly, the School of Design became the darling of the university, attracting national attention vastly out of proportion with its size or age.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Key elements making up the foundation for the architecture program were:<\/p>\n\n\n\n In 1970, three years before Henry Kamphoefner retired as dean, the architecture program began to transition to more diverse paths toward architectural education, largely due to national trends. The most notable of these was the transition from the five-year Bachelor of Architecture degree as the only degree path to a four-year non-professional architecture degree with an optional two-year professional Master of Architecture degree following. This 4+2 degree model was manifest here as a 2+2+2 sequence, in which the first two years of basic design were common to all undergraduates in the School of Design.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Several other changes followed, as Dean Claude McKinney (1973-1988) deferred to faculty to conceive and deliver design education, extensively empowering school-wide committees for governance. Among these changes were the following.<\/p>\n\n\n\n In the 1980s, other changes began under Dean McKinney, then continued under Deans Thomas Regan (1989-1994), and Marvin Malecha (1994-2015). They continue now under Dean Mark Hoversten (2015 \u2013 present). The most notable of these were:<\/p>\n\n\n\n Clarity of vision requires capable people who can articulate that vision in such a way that others can give it life. It began with Henry Kamphoefner, but he was greatly assisted by Lewis Mumford, a part-time faculty member who set out the philosophical direction and curriculum of the young school, and who urged the dean to hire Matthew Nowicki as the first department head of architecture. Though Nowicki was only able to serve as head for two years before his tragic death in an airplane crash when returning after two months working on the design of India\u2019s new nation\u2019s capital of Chandigarh. Nowicki\u2019s 1950 design of Dorton Arena would be realized by his collaborator William Henley Dietrick in 1952, two years after Nowicki\u2019s death.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Argentine-born architect Eduardo Catalano became head of architecture in 1951 and remained until 1956 when he took a faculty position at MIT. During his time as head, the stature of the architecture program grew substantially, fueled by the achievements of faculty and students.<\/p>\n\n\n\n A novel administrative model was in place between 1956 and 1967, in which Henry Kamphoefner was both dean of the school and de facto dead of the Department of Architecture.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Robert \u201cBob\u201d Burns, a native of Roxboro, North Carolina, studied under Catalano here and earned his Bachelor of Architecture degree in 1957. He completed graduate studies at MIT, again studying under Catalano, and then working for several years in Catalano\u2019s architectural practice in Boston on several substantial projects. Bob returned to Raleigh in 1965 and became one of our most important and effective faculty members. Bob was head of architecture in multiple stints beginning in 1967, adding up to seventeen years as head. During some of those years he was also associate dean for academics at the school\/college level. Bob was an inspiration to the thousand or more students he taught, and to the faculty colleagues that he mentored. Many of these alums went on to leadership roles in practice and academia. In architecture faculty meetings, while many of us struggled with the complexities of the problems being discussed, Bob would step in to gracefully chart a vivid path to elegant solutions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Clearly, the intellectual \u201cfamily tree\u201d of architecture may have begun with Henry Kamphoefner, but it continues to grow and branch into directions not foreseen by the school\u2019s founders, through the efforts of many who came after them.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Let\u2019s summarize here some of the means used to bring great people to the School of Design and the Department of Architecture.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Clarity of vision, infused with talented people, often yields remarkable achievements. The architecture program earned recognition and acclaim almost immediately.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The talent and ambition of the young School of Design yielded student and faculty works that won national and international recognitions unexpected by such a new, small southern school. Faculty and visiting faculty won praise for their innovative projects carried out in practice, which were published widely. Works by Matthew Nowicki, George Matsumoto, Buckminster Fuller, James Fitzgibbons and many others are examples of this.<\/p>\n\n\n\n School of Design student recognitions took place in the most important international competitions available: the Rome Prize and the Paris Prize annual competitions. To receive eight awards within a twenty-year period was unprecedented. Winning students were the following.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Alums of the architecture program continue to earn respect at prestigious graduate programs, in excellent offices around the world, and have won countless awards and honors themselves.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Like other architecture programs in the country in the 1950\u2019s, white males made up the vast majority of the faculty and student populations. In this context, milestones worthy of note include:<\/p>\n\n\n\n For several decades the architecture program has sought university and external support to enhance minority presence, but support has been insufficient to date. Efforts will certainly continue. Regarding gender, architecture now has approximate parity in male and female student enrollment. International enrollment has recently grown significantly in the graduate Architecture programs.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Leadership in architectural education is another indicator of the influence of this architecture program. The following individuals were elected to serve as president of the Association of Collegiate Schools of Architecture (ACSA) before, during or after being at this school.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The ACSA Distinguished Professor Award sets out \u201cTo recognize individuals that have had a positive, stimulating, and nurturing influence upon students.\u201d Generally, up to 5 individuals per year nationally are selected for this recognition.<\/p>\n\n\n\n (this award program began in 1984)<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n The Topaz Medallion is a singular honor, one person per year nationally is chosen by a panel representing the American Institute of Architects and the Association of Collegiate Schools of Architecture. Two Topaz Laureates were dean at this institution when they were selected.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Leadership in the profession is difficult to quantify. Many noble endeavors go without recognition in standard ways. The American Institute of Architects elevates to the College of Fellows individuals who have distinguished themselves in some way as architects. Each year between five and ten of these honorees are alumni or faculty from our program. Many of the part-time professors of the practice (formerly known as adjunct faculty) who teach studios and courses are AIA Fellows. This talent pool is a rich resource for our students; they serve as role models for emerging professionals. Regarding our permanent faculty, at one time, five of our fourteen full-time faculty in architecture were AIA Fellows. At that time, the only other institution in the country with five or more Fellows was Berkeley, which had 35 full-time faculty.<\/p>\n\n\n\n This inventory of achievements by people associated with the architecture programs certainly continues to grow. Achievements will continue in existing categories, and new categories may emerge reflecting the greater global awareness and cultural diversity of the program.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The School of Architecture continues to draw on the past and build on the foundations established by early administrators, faculty, students, and others. The school is evolving to take on the challenges and opportunities of contemporary architectural education and practice. Some examples of new programs and initiatives include the following.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The School of Architecture offers many opportunities for students and faculty in multidisciplinary research, teaching, and learning: These include the following, and a growing number of others.<\/p>\n\n\n\n A more diverse profession is heralded by a more diverse and international School of Architecture faculty and student body. The BEDA program is ~65% women and over 30% minorities. The graduate program has achieved gender equity and draws students from the US and many other countries. We are taking on major socio-cultural and technological issues to continually address our changing world.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The celebration of the 75th<\/sup> Anniversary of the founding of the School \/ College of Design is a time to proudly reflect, but also to set new goals and boldly venture in new directions. This is the time for us to reassess the vision<\/strong>, engage the people<\/strong> and set off toward new achievements<\/strong>.<\/p>\n"},"excerpt":{"rendered":" A reflection on the first seventy-five years of the College of Design, written by Pat Rand, Roger Clark and David Hill. <\/p>\n The celebration of the 75th Anniversary of the founding of the School \/ College of Design is a time to proudly reflect, but also to set new goals and boldly venture in new directions. This is the time for us to reassess the vision, engage the people and set off toward new achievements.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":13,"featured_media":27182,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"source":"","ncst_custom_author":"Patrick Rand, Roger Clark and David Hill","ncst_show_custom_author":true,"ncst_dynamicHeaderBlockName":"ncst\/default-post-header","ncst_dynamicHeaderData":"{\"caption\":\"School of Design Matsumoto Wing Addition of Brooks Hall, 1972. Photo by Pat Rand. \",\"showAuthor\":true,\"showDate\":false,\"showFeaturedVideo\":false,\"showReadingTime\":false}","ncst_content_audit_freq":"","ncst_content_audit_date":"","ncst_content_audit_display":false,"ncst_backToTopFlag":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[13],"class_list":["post-27177","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-uncategorized","tag-architecture"],"displayCategory":null,"acf":{"ncst_posts_meta_modified_date":null},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/design.ncsu.edu\/architecture\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/27177","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/design.ncsu.edu\/architecture\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/design.ncsu.edu\/architecture\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/design.ncsu.edu\/architecture\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/13"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/design.ncsu.edu\/architecture\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=27177"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/design.ncsu.edu\/architecture\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/27177\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":27189,"href":"https:\/\/design.ncsu.edu\/architecture\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/27177\/revisions\/27189"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/design.ncsu.edu\/architecture\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/27182"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/design.ncsu.edu\/architecture\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=27177"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/design.ncsu.edu\/architecture\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=27177"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/design.ncsu.edu\/architecture\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=27177"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
Reflections and Actions: An Inspiration for the Future<\/em>, 1996<\/p><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n\nClarity of Vision<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n
\n
\n

\n

\n
\n
People<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n
\n

Achievements<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n
Rome Prize<\/strong> (Prix de Rome):<\/h4>\n\n\n\n
\n
Paris Prize<\/strong>:<\/h4>\n\n\n\n
\n
\n
ACSA Presidents<\/strong>:<\/h4>\n\n\n\n
\n
ACSA Distinguished Professors<\/strong>:<\/h4>\n\n\n\n
\n
Topaz Laureates<\/strong>:<\/h4>\n\n\n\n
\n
American Institute of Architects Fellows<\/strong>:<\/h4>\n\n\n\n
\n

\n

\n
Reflections and Actions: An Inspiration for the Future<\/em>, 1996<\/p><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\nClarity of Vision<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n
\n
\n

\n

\n
\n
People<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n
\n

Achievements<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n
Rome Prize<\/strong> (Prix de Rome):<\/h4>\n\n\n\n
\n
Paris Prize<\/strong>:<\/h4>\n\n\n\n
\n
\n
ACSA Presidents<\/strong>:<\/h4>\n\n\n\n
\n
ACSA Distinguished Professors<\/strong>:<\/h4>\n\n\n\n
\n
Topaz Laureates<\/strong>:<\/h4>\n\n\n\n
\n
American Institute of Architects Fellows<\/strong>:<\/h4>\n\n\n\n
\n

\n

\n